Far from being a ‘digital democracy,’ the Internet is dominated by the opinions of rich, powerful people, according to a study from the University of California, Berkeley.

You needed to fund a study to figure that out? Hey, whadya know, the internet has a learning curve! If you thought “the Internet would give the poor and disenfranchised a voice” and are disappointed that they haven’t dropped everything else in their lives to (learn how to) use it, and in the meantime, the wealthy and educated have used some of their copious spare time to take the lead, was hindsight really necessary? You didn’t see this coming? Sorry to break it to you, but a couple of decades is not enough time to create a world where money does not equal political power, no matter how revolutionary the proposed mechanism might be.

I don’t know about you, but I have yet to get used to the menu structure of Office 2007, so different from the familiar one in Office 2003. It has always struck me as change for its own sake, throwing off imitators like OpenOffice, and more in the service of Microsoft than of users. It would seem that someone in the Evil Empire has seen the light and offered an olive branch. You can now download a new feature that offers help in finding commands from Office 2003 in Office 2007. I don’t know how long it’s been around, but the video demo from the link was recorded in March 2010. I don’t have a copy of Office 2007 yet, so I’m have no way of trying this out for myself, but I know I’ll eventually need it, so I present the information here as much to preserve the idea for myself as to help spread the word in my own limited way.

There is a recommended procedure on personal computers called “defragmenting.” What follows is a layman’s description of how a hard drive works and why defragmenting is important. Read the rest of this entry »

A reader named Anand suggested diagrams for the scan test basics article. I’m happy to oblige. Read the rest of this entry »

In light of this week’s Supreme Court decision, here are a few words of advice from a former marksmanship instructor to anyone tempted to run out and buy a handgun for home defense. Read the rest of this entry »

I have two LinkedIn tutorial presentations available, an older Basic PDF file, and a newer Advanced PPS file. Of course, at the rate LinkedIn changes things, neither of these presentations is entirely up-to-date (that would require a great deal of maintenance), but both are still useful.

One of the highest-traffic articles I’ve written for this blog is Scan Test Basics. It seems fitting to review that article and add a few more thoughts on this topic.

Read the rest of this entry »

It occurs to me that something I’ve been saying for a long time is probably applicable to the most recent financial meltdown, and it has to do with the widely held sentiment that, no matter what it is that we do, “We are in business to make money.” My blood boils every time I hear this statement uttered as though it were common knowledge and inherently obvious. The problem is that it is not only misguided, it is 180 degrees wrong! We are not in business to make money, we make money to stay in business. Read the rest of this entry »

A blog post by Matt (who, I’ve just noticed, posts his picture but not his last name in his blog) seems similar to something I’ve been saying for a number of years, that EDA GUIs are not designed, they grow. These are tools intended for use by other engineers, and they still suffer from the same points Matt lists. Enjoy!

Well, I haven’t written anything in awhile, and the big news story is the health care debate in Congress, so I’ll use this forum to weigh in with my two cents.

People opposed to health care reform tell scary stories about the prospect of rationing health care. The definition of “rationing” is “restricting the consumption of a relatively scarce commodity”. If health care is a relatively scarce commodity, either it will be rationed or it will be distributed unfairly, with many people not getting any. Kind of like the current situation. If it is not scarce, it won’t be. Given that health care is neither free nor cheap, it stands to reason that it will not be overly abundant, hence, it should be rationed. The only question is by whom and by what criteria. The criterion could be first come, first served, or it could by according to wealth, supply and demand. If we are compassionate, it will be by need. Then the only question is by whom. Would you prefer government bureaucrats or insurance company bureaucrats? Or someone else? Insurance company bureaucrats are incentivized, directly or indirectly, by insurance company profits. How government bureaucrats would be incentivized is uncertain. Who do you mistrust more?